Book #141 of 2024:
The Bright Sword by Lev Grossman
As a genre, Arthuriana tends to be at its finest — with Alfred, Lord Tennyson’s Idylls of the King remaining the absolute gold standard for me — when pitched as a tragedy, inviting us to invest in the glimmering dream of Camelot so that its eventual dissolution under petty human flaws carries a real weight of loss to it. We should feel the sorrow of King Arthur’s passing, much as we should feel the anxious flutter earlier on in his reign, recognizing the shape of the familiar plot ahead and reading on regardless, almost despite ourselves.
That’s an element that author Lev Grossman proves he knows well in this new iteration of the Arthurian legend, just as he understands the tension of dubious historicity in the tradition — how authentic details can help ground Arthur in a specific moment of post-Roman Britain, and yet our classic touchstones of castles and armor and tournaments and such are anachronisms from later medieval texts that can’t be easily reconciled. His Camelot embraces all that, like the inherent everyday magic that the knights regularly encounter around them, and while it may not be historical, it breathes as a fully realized construct within the boundaries of its own terms.
Grossman’s keenest authorial instinct, however, is to set this story primarily in the wake of Arthur himself, via a new young protagonist arriving at the Round Table soon after the climactic final battle between the king and his bastard son Mordred. It’s a part of the narrative that’s usually an afterthought for writers, but here it’s the main attraction, asking how the kingdom and its few bloodied survivors can possibly go on after the dream has been extinguished for them. It’s the sort of extended sequel that more tragedies should receive, refusing to let the curtain drop on a tidy ending after all, and it’s absolutely riveting to watch unfold.
“When Icarus flew too near the sun, he lost his wings and fell and died,” Grossman writes in his typically lovely prose. “That’s what happened to heroes who played heavenly games. But Death didn’t bother with the ordinary folk, the extras. They had it tougher; they had to keep on living, crawling forward in the dark with no moon or even any stars to light their way.” In a sense, the approach links this take on the legend with fantasy works that have been inspired by it over the years, like J. R. R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings or Stephen R. Donaldson’s The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant, the Unbeliever, which are likewise built around fallible individuals living among the ruins and faded grandeur of some epic golden age and daunted by the pressure of living up to their heroic forebears. Grossman’s surviving knights are similarly left alone now, and forced to chart their own destinies in the absence of their beloved liege.
Meanwhile, that thread is complemented by periodic flashbacks from a variety of perspectives fleshing out how those characters experienced the more halcyon days beforehand, which gives the work the greater texture, albeit piecemeal, of the traditional saga. It’s a book that’s very much in conversation with previous versions of the tale (though you don’t have to bring that familiarity to the reading experience yourself), but is nevertheless unafraid to invent bold new additions to the myth as well. Sir Bedivere is gay in this telling, with an unrequited romantic attraction to his king, while Sir Dinadan is a trans man who fled an arranged marriage to become a knight. These are not one-off tokens for diversity’s sake, but rather facets of their respective characterizations that are deeply explored and woven into the wider fabric of events.
As a novel, The Bright Sword can occasionally seem episodic, although that’s equally true of the classical accounts from the likes of Chrétien de Troyes or Thomas Malory, and the larger plot gradually picks up momentum as it nears its end and draws everything back together again. The ultimate result is a triumph, well deserving of a spot in that same hallowed pantheon, and I can only hope that Grossman’s own contributions to the ever-evolving mythology of King Arthur will in turn appear in some future retellings, somewhere down the line.
[Content warning for racism, sexism, antisemitism, transphobia, homophobia, ableism, rape, incest, and gore.]
★★★★★
Like this review?
–Throw me a quick one-time donation here!
https://ko-fi.com/lesserjoke
–Subscribe here to support my writing and weigh in on what I read next!
https://patreon.com/lesserjoke
–Follow along on Goodreads here!
https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/6288479-joe-kessler
–Or click here to browse through all my reviews!
https://lesserjoke.home.blog