The Lesser Joke: book reviews and more

TV Review: Gilmore Girls: A Year in the Life, season 1

TV #46 of 2023:

Gilmore Girls: A Year in the Life, season 1

Three-and-a-half stars, rounded up. There’s a lot of things I enjoy about this unexpected Netflix revival, which aired in 2016 after the original WB/CW program ended in 2007. In a review at the time, I mentioned:

“It really feels like ten years have gone by for these characters. So many TV series that get brought back after a long absence either try to act like no time has passed (e.g. Arrested Development) or make it into a reunion where most of the characters are seeing each other again for the first time since the show ended (e.g. Veronica Mars). But watching Gilmore Girls: A Year in the Life is like watching the latest season from a world where the show never went off the air.”

And that remains largely true, even coming directly from a rewatch of the older seasons this time. The primary driver of that verisimilitude is in the returning cast: not just the main actors, but all of the smaller supporting roles around them that help make Stars Hollow seem like a living, breathing community. Some of those familiar faces only pop in for a quick scene or two — presumably due to their other commitments, especially for performers like Jared Padalecki and Melissa McCarthy whose careers had taken off over the previous decade — but they collectively work to flesh out the enterprise considerably. I can’t help but compare this to another recent TV sequel, the mediocre Justified: City Primeval that tried to get by with only bringing back its core protagonist, and vastly prefer this approach. It’s simply great to get to check in on so many beloved characters throughout this four-part miniseries.

As for the weaker elements, well… I suppose it wouldn’t be Gilmore Girls if there wasn’t some degree of random manufactured drama hanging over the affair. Four 90-minute episodes paradoxically represent both too much and too little of a canvas here. Certain character beats seem rushed and ill-supported, while the program indulgently lingers on wackier moments that should have been trimmed, like Taylor’s awful Stars Hollow musical or Lorelai’s bizarre ‘Wild’ excursion (a plot device that already seemed dated in 2016 and is downright creaky when viewed today). Overall, I think the winter and spring segments are significantly better than the two quarters that follow them — and not just because that first half directly confronts the absence of patriarch Richard Gilmore, whose actor Edward Herrmann had passed away in the meantime. They also spend more of their runtime catching viewers up on what everyone else has been doing since 2007, and thus don’t have as much room for the sort of petty new fights (between Lorelai and Emily, between Lorelai and Luke, between Lorelai and Rory, etc.) that get picked later on.

I don’t really mind the very ending, though I know it remains divisive among fans. Likewise for the younger Gilmore’s aimlessness throughout the year, which might be disappointing given her promising early academics, but seems to me relatively in line with the struggles she evinced in the last few original seasons. Still, I wish this project didn’t ignore how Rory is the same age now that her mother was when that older show began, which could have been a productive lens to filter the nostalgia that a revival like this is inherently built upon.

Overall, though, there’s plenty here for anyone who loved the classic run of the series, and the production stands as a welcome return for writer-showrunners Amy Sherman-Palladino and Daniel Palladino, who were infamously fired before the start of work on the last season back then. It’s fitting to have them as the creative force behind this follow-up installment, especially if it’s meant to stand as an overall finale to the extended franchise.

Will we ever get more Gilmore Girls? Seven years further on (and in the midst of an ongoing writers and actors strike), the prospect of reassembling the entire cast again seems somewhat unlikely, and Kelly Bishop in particular isn’t getting any younger. I could maybe imagine a ‘next generation’ approach sometime down the road that more explicitly slots Rory into the former Lorelai role with a teenage child of her own, but is anyone really clamoring for that sort of sequel if it couldn’t have all the old familiar figures? For those of us who love the series, all the original episodes are always there to return to, and I can personally attest that they hold up pretty well. Generally speaking, this miniseries does too.

[Content warning for fatphobia / body-shaming.]

★★★★☆

Like this review?
–Throw me a quick one-time donation here!
https://ko-fi.com/lesserjoke
–Subscribe here to support my writing and weigh in on what I read next!
https://patreon.com/lesserjoke
–Follow along on Goodreads here!
https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/6288479-joe-kessler
–Or click here to browse through all my previous reviews!
https://lesserjoke.home.blog

TV Review: Classic Doctor Who, season 8

TV #45 of 2023:

Classic Doctor Who, season 8

The Third Doctor’s sophomore season leans into the strengths of the previous year, which showed how the venerable sci-fi program could adapt its time-traveling and space-hopping premise to an earthbound format, with the hero assisting the UNIT military forces fend off alien invasions. He’s now joined by new companion Jo Grant, a plucky youngster who doesn’t quite fit in with the army setting but whose beaming face would endear her to audiences and the Doctor alike. She’d stick around on the show for another few years, and ultimately cast as wide an influence over the continuing franchise as her eventual replacement Sarah Jane Smith (as proved by her triumphant return on the latter’s modern spinoff series).

But the major innovation of this season is of course the Master, a Moriarty / Blofeld figure set up to be the protagonist’s nemesis and opposite. A Time Lord who’s just as brilliant but utterly ruthless, he represents a funhouse-mirror foil of the Doctor, which is a device that the writers hadn’t really explored before. He makes an impression in the first serial, but then sticks around for every further story this year as well, constituting an ongoing threat that is again unlike any recurring villain or monsters previously seen on Doctor Who. He’d return many times after this, even regenerating to be portrayed by multiple actors like his enemy, but his original version is everywhere in this debut sequence, played archly by the talented Roger Delgado. The impact to the canon can’t be overstated, yet neither can his immediate contributions here. Sometimes the primary antagonist, sometimes a side complication, and occasionally even a reluctant ally, he’s exactly the addition that the UNIT era needed to remain fresh.

The five serials in this run range from solid to excellent, and I especially love when the Time Lords meddle in the Doctor’s exile: warning him about the Master’s arrival in Terror of the Autons and even temporarily staying his sentence to allow for an old-fashioned journey off-planet in Colony in Space. We don’t meet any more iconic creatures this time around — though Axos perhaps comes close — but the Master is terrific and the Autons hold up well in their second outing. Overall it’s another fine year for the show.

[Content warning for gun violence.]

Serials ranked from worst to best:

★★★☆☆
THE MIND OF EVIL (8×5 – 8×10)
THE DÆMONS (8×21 – 8×25)

★★★★☆
THE CLAWS OF AXOS (8×11 – 8×14)
COLONY IN SPACE (8×15 – 8×20)

★★★★★
TERROR OF THE AUTONS (8×1 – 8×4)

Overall rating for the season: ★★★★☆

TV Review: What We Do in the Shadows, season 5

TV #44 of 2023:

What We Do in the Shadows, season 5

Another delightfully funny season of this vampire comedy, and one that finally pulls the trigger on a long-mentioned possible direction for the show. (I’m trying, as ever, to avoid major spoilers in the space of a review.) Guillermo starts the year keeping a big secret from the others, and in a nifty bit of structuring, they gradually learn it one-by-one over the course of these ten episodes. That creative decision yields much more interesting scene combinations and weekly plot premises than if either a) he was hiding it from everyone else the whole time, or b) they were to all find out at once. And of course, Nandor is the last to be clued in, as his relationship with his familiar has the most built-up drama and pathos behind it. Whether you ship them romantically or not, those two men mean something to each other, and the writing sharply recognizes this by saving their big emotional confrontation for the finale.

I’m not thrilled at how, like the baby Colin story before it, this one ultimately resolves by reverting back to roughly the old status quo, nor that the issue of romance is left in the subtext, where it’s languished since long before both Nandor and Gizmo were confirmed as canonically queer. I don’t need them to get together, but I would like for the series to actually engage with that question rather than just occasionally having the camera linger on an unguarded moment of pining or a revealing turn of phrase.

Meanwhile, the Guide and Nadja have mini-arcs of their own this time, although they’re a bit one-note and I saw their respective endings coming pretty far in advance. Laszlo and Colin have even less current focus, but as ever are both great as consistently-entertaining punchline machines. While overall this isn’t my favorite run of the program and I wish it could have had a more propulsive ending to it like the one beforehand, I’ll readily acknowledge that I’ve laughed throughout, and that the show remains as surprising and fresh and hilarious as ever. Three-and-a-half stars, rounded up.

[Content warning for gore.]

★★★★☆

TV Review: Justified: City Primeval, season 1

TV #43 of 2023:

Justified: City Primeval, season 1

This eight-episode miniseries roughly works as a standalone crime drama, but it doesn’t feel much like Justified. And by pedigree, it isn’t: it’s an adaptation of an unrelated Elmore Leonard novel, onto which Raylan Givens has been somewhat awkwardly grafted as a new protagonist for this 2023 production. Up until a coda in the last fifteen minutes of the finale (which I would recommend fans take the time to check out, my other comments here notwithstanding), he’s the only returning character from the original FX run.

This series is set in the present day, but also fifteen years after we last saw the deputy US marshal in 2015 — a bit of chronological weirdness that seems to have been thrown in just to allow the casting of teenage nepo baby Vivian Olyphant as her father’s daughter. She’s with him initially as he gets caught up in a messy situation in Detroit, but then blessedly vanishes for the majority of the plot.

That setting is odd. It doesn’t resemble the version of Detroit previously seen on Justified, nor do we hear from/about any affiliated people like Wynn Duffie who could have plausibly been included in the current affair. Moreover, the titular ‘city primeval’ never gels together into a firm sense of place or shared identity among its residents, as was very much the case for the original Harlan location, which could almost be described as a Justified character in and of itself. I had my share of critiques about the former show, but most folks there were on a specific wavelength of clever, funny, and profane that’s unmatched by any such commonality across this program’s Detroit. What makes the people here different, both from what we might expect and from what Givens is used to in Florida and Kentucky? Is the main villain particularly suited to the spot, the way Boyd Crowder and Raylan both were to Harlan County? Show us! It all just feels so drearily generic.

(I think I also had an easier time suspending my disbelief that everyone knew each other and would wind up involved in one another’s subplots in a small community like that; the number of coincidental connections in a big metropolitan environment this time doesn’t seem nearly as natural. In the first episode alone, Givens is randomly attacked by a criminal whose lawyer turns out to also represent the guy who later kills the judge of the earlier case who was recently the target of an unrelated death threat Raylan was looking into. Phew!)

The primary focus of the story is on that killer, a chaos agent whom local law enforcement seems unable to bring to justice. That element could work if he were positioned as a remotely effective antagonist, but instead he seems to survive and thrive based largely on luck. If anything, Clement Mansell resembles the sort of grandiose wannabe who would roll into Harlan, assume he’s smarter than everyone else, and end up killed in an episode or two by the canny operators like Boyd who know the lay of the land so much better. The original Justified would have chewed him up and spit him out in no time flat, which makes it frustrating to see him presented as relatively untouchable here.

Eventually that storyline wraps up, and the show ends on a sequence that, without spoilers, feels much more in line with what a viewer might expect of this franchise. Is this whole thing just an extended and rather digressive bridge to a potential further Justified title, one that could function as a truer sequel to the old Kentucky days? The ending succeeds as a general proof-of-concept for what might come next, but the hours leading up to it are too weak to justify (sorry) not just starting from that point for a follow-up instead.

[Content warning for gun violence, torture, racism, homophobia, and gore.]

★★☆☆☆

Book Review: Doctor Who: Doom’s Day: Four from Doom’s Day by Darren Jones

Book #102 of 2023:

Doctor Who: Doom’s Day: Four from Doom’s Day by Darren Jones

Doom’s Day is a Doctor Who transmedia event, meaning an ongoing storyline that plays out across multiple different platforms, from comic books to video games to novels and beyond. Theoretically, each installment is self-contained enough that it can be enjoyed in isolation, but with deeper connections to the others for more dedicated fans to spot. The overall plot to this particular series, as I understand it, is that an assassin named Doom is being chased by the personification of death itself, who will kill her in 24 hours unless she manages to find the Doctor first. She has a list of missions she’s attempting in the meantime — which also might be temporarily holding her fate at bay? — and a vortex manipulator that she’s hoping will help her track down the wayward hero.

If my summary sounds a little unclear or uncertain, it’s because this audiobook, which spans hours 16-19 of the titular day, doesn’t really do a great job of introducing the situation to readers like me who skipped the earlier releases. I’ll extend the benefit of the doubt and assume that my frustrations and open questions are addressed elsewhere, but the fact remains that this title isn’t nearly as standalone as it’s been advertised to be. It’s certainly much worse on that front than the previous such multi-platform project that this franchise attempted, the uneven but interesting exploration of the universe’s ancient history in Time Lord: Victorious.

Absent the context of the larger arc (and ignoring the punny play on the name of the 1982 Fifth Doctor serial Four to Doomsday, which is otherwise unrelated), this book isn’t particularly noteworthy or impressive. I don’t feel invested in Doom as a protagonist with meaningful stakes on the line, and her specific outings here are serviceable filler at best. It’s fun to see original companions Ian and Barbara on a romantic cruise after their time with the First Doctor, and returning fellow hired gun Brian the Ood from Time Lord: Victorious is delightful as always, but nothing about these cases leaves me curious as to Doom’s origins or her ultimate destiny. (Instead, her late encounter with the Twelfth Doctor, whom she brushes off as not the right incarnation she wants, is an incredibly frustrating closing note.)

I’d love to study the BBC’s internal figures on who’s in the audience for this sort of thing, and whether they’re generally satisfied by the exercise or not. Personally, I’m not seeing the point of it.

[Content warning for gun violence.]

★★☆☆☆

Book Review: Cassandra in Reverse by Holly Smale

Book #101 of 2023:

Cassandra in Reverse by Holly Smale

The neurodivergent heroine of this #ownvoices novel (published as The Cassandra Complex in author Holly Smale’s native UK) reminds me a lot of the titular character in Eleanor Oliphant Is Completely Fine — a comparison which, not to spoil that book, had me dreading a potential twist that the fun time-travel element of this one would turn out to be nothing but a delusion response to trauma. I am happy to report that that’s not the case: Cassandra actually does gain the ability to rewind her life and make different choices in difficult social situations, like a gamer restoring from an earlier save state. There’s never any real explanation for where that power comes from, but since the story isn’t aiming to be hard science-fiction, that’s not a problem for me.

I also love that while the protagonist’s initial impetus for all these redos is to preserve her floundering romance, that focus gradually gives way to a plot of her opening up with the other people around her, like a flatmate or a coworker she’s previously dismissed as distracting acquaintances at best. Honestly, I still would have enjoyed this read if it had stayed entirely within the romcom genre, because Cassie is such an entertainingly straightforward voice as she navigates a world so incomprehensible to her. She can’t always parse things like sarcasm, so of course she takes advantage of her newfound technique to try again whenever she gets something wrong! But the fact that this is ultimately a tale of her growing more comfortable in her own skin, and not just getting/keeping a guy, is what really makes it special.

It helps as well that she’s not too underhanded in her repeated dealings with everyone, although there’s admittedly a fair bit of deception and manipulation inherent in the premise. Cassandra is lying to her boyfriend to ensure that their second attempt at dating goes smoother than the first one he doesn’t know about, but she isn’t tricking him like Bill Murray in Groundhog Day learning facts about an attractive stranger to bypass gaining her trust and woo her into bed on a later go-round. Indeed, since our traveler isn’t sure whether she’s creating branching realities that will continue on without her after she jumps back in her personal timeline, she’s meticulous about never behaving too inappropriately (a solid metaphor for the comfort and security of familiar autistic routines, which Cassie also has in abundance). She’ll blow off work to wander a museum for the afternoon, knowing she can then undo that choice and satisfy her professional responsibilities after all, but she isn’t acting out violently for the no-stakes thrill as some people in her circumstances might.

It’s not a flawless narrative. A couple beats that seem obvious to me, like the heroine’s diagnosis or the identity of a certain mysterious stalker, are for some reason drawn out and played as grand reveals, when they could have been simply presented and addressed head-on. And while I personally appreciate Cassandra’s infodumping about her Trojan namesake and other trivia of Greco-Roman mythology throughout, I’ve seen enough reviews complaining about that component to acknowledge that it probably could have been scaled back a degree. Nevertheless, this is a novel that charmed me right from the start and only grew more endearing as it went along, and for that it merits my highest critical rating.

[Content warning for parental death, ableism, and alcohol abuse.]

★★★★★

TV Review: Good Omens, season 2

TV #42 of 2023:

Good Omens, season 2

This unexpected follow-up just about squeaks by on a character level, but it’s a far cry from either the previous season or the increasingly-distant source text of the hilarious original novel. To recap: that 1990 book by future showrunner Neil Gaiman and the late Terry Pratchett was adapted roughly in its entirety for the first year of this Amazon production, and no one expected that there would be anything further in the pipeline. Then Gaiman announced a surprise second season (and his hopes for a third), apparently drawing from conversations he and his co-author had once had about where they might someday take a sequel.

The result here is decidedly mixed, and in my opinion rarely actually feels like classic Good Omens. Perhaps it’s the missing element of Sir Terry’s typical madcap contributions, or perhaps just the fact that most of the bumbling mortal ensemble hasn’t been brought back for this next go-round: no Adam and his cohort and family and dog, no Newton and Anathema and Shadwell, and so on (although a few cast members do return, somewhat confusingly, in separate new roles). Instead the angel Aziraphale and the demon Crowley take up even more of the plot than before, even though their central storyline of the archangel Gabriel showing up on earth with amnesia is pretty threadbare.

As if in recognition of the fact that there isn’t quite enough action there to stretch out over six episodes, most installments include lengthy flashback interludes to the supernatural beings’ long history together on earth. Some of these sequences are fun — I quite like the Job one, and not just for the stunt-casting of David Tennant’s famous father-in-law and fellow Doctor Who alum Peter Davison in that part — but mostly they drag on well past their entertainment value and don’t contribute much to the larger narrative.

I do still enjoy the main protagonists and the dry humor of this particular interpretation of Heaven and Hell — not to mention the increasing levels of queer representation — so sure, I’ll keep watching if there’s any more of this show to come. (At six hours a season, it’s not like it’s a major time commitment, anyway.) But this new material seems more like a Gaiman vanity project than a story that urgently needed to be told, and I can’t say that I’d especially recommend it. Or to put that differently, if a sequel anything like this actually had been written and published, I don’t think it would have sold nearly as well as the cult classic that spawned it.

[Content warning for gun violence, torture, and gore.]

★★★☆☆

Book Review: The Clocks by Agatha Christie

Book #100 of 2023:

The Clocks by Agatha Christie (Hercule Poirot #39)

This novel is a bit all over the place, and not just because the narrative switches back and forth between first-person and various third-person perspectives. Author Agatha Christie could write good mysteries and good spy thrillers, but she seems to run into trouble whenever she tries to combine them, as here. The premise at least is distinctive: an intelligence agent pursuing some seemingly-unrelated inquiries in a certain neighborhood stumbles across a flustered typist, who has just found a murdered man surrounded by clocks in the home of the blind woman she has come to assist. Only the client maintains that the timepieces are not hers, and that she never requested anyone from the secretarial agency that day in the first place. The police are thus understandably flummoxed, both by the identity of the killer and by the question of why the victim’s body was arranged to be discovered in that fashion.

Hercule Poirot wanders into the plot around a third of the way through, and by the time he’s laid out all the available clues, the solution turns out coincidence-heavy to a highly unsatisfactory degree. (I don’t judge such books by whether I can figure them out before the detective, but in this case, it does seem relevant that I cracked the whodunnit well in advance but remained clueless about the actual motive behind the crime until the end.) Just how many murderers and spies are there in this small stretch of houses, inadvertently contributing red herrings to one another’s respective shenanigans? More than you’d think, that’s for sure.

[Content warning for racism including slurs.]

★★☆☆☆

Book Review: Light Bringer by Pierce Brown

Book #99 of 2023:

Light Bringer by Pierce Brown (Red Rising #6)

Another thrilling installment of the sprawling Red Rising space opera, and although I still don’t think this sequel era quite matches the engaging fury that propelled the original trilogy, this is easily the finest of the later books yet (and a welcome step back from the bleakness of its excellent but aptly-named predecessor Dark Age). The four narrator perspectives are nicely woven together, the cinematic action sequences are as stunning as ever, and the various plot twists of sudden betrayals, alliances, and other intrigues are breathtaking yet firmly rooted in a sense of personal history amongst the relevant players seeking to outmaneuver one another. A few individual confrontations are particularly well-earned — CLANG! CLANG!, eh, fellow readers? — and pay off longstanding arcs with aplomb, while central protagonist Darrow undergoes remarkable growth and change in his own journey through life and reckoning with past misdeeds.

Indeed, I like this novel so much that I’ve come close to rating it five stars, which I haven’t done for this extended series since #2 Golden Son. My one critique — which might be unavoidable for volume three of a planned quartet, spanning in Game of Thrones fashion such a deep ensemble and vast arena of space — is that a few characters who are important early on seem to then vanish from the narrative, while others we would expect to take a role in the latest events instead stay largely off-screen for now. I remain fully on-board with this saga and have complete faith in author Pierce Brown to deliver a satisfying conclusion in the next title, but this one falls just short of his best work in my final analysis.

[Content warning for gun violence, torture, and gore.]

★★★★☆

Book Review: Orion in the Dying Time by Ben Bova

Book #98 of 2023:

Orion in the Dying Time by Ben Bova (Orion #3)

This time-travel adventure sequel offers probably the most problematic of its saga’s dabbles in what the back of this book calls ‘speculative theology,’ taking as its premise the wild notion that the ancient Egyptian god Set is the same being as Christianity’s Satan — and a murderous reptilian alien from another universe, to boot. The ensuing plot finds humanity’s champion Orion struggling against that foe and his minions in the Neolithic, Cretaceous, and far-future eras as they seek to supplant us throughout the space-time continuum, and while I think author Ben Bova is trying to offer a twist on the first novel in the series (which revealed that humans once did much the same to Neanderthals), it plays out here as too similar a conflict in practice.

More interesting on a character dimension is the fact that the protagonist’s divine love interest accompanies him for most of this title, having previously been largely either separated or present in a mortal guise with no memory of her true self. We finally get to see the lovers as an actual couple for an extended period of the narrative, and they seem like a good match with their shared warrior spirit, although Orion has some needlessly angsty moments when he temporarily (repeatedly!) thinks she’s abandoned him.

This was my least favorite of its series when I read the lot as a teenager, and I can’t say that it’s improved after decades away. It’s also definitely the work of a male science-fiction writer from 1990, with its gratuitous female (including underage) nudity, infanticide, and gore, none of which are handled with particular respect. At its best amid all the flamethrower-wielding dinosaurs and whatnot, the story does manage to achieve a level of pulpy fun akin to something like A Princess of Mars, or perhaps Planet of the Apes crossed with the prehistoric epoch of Chrono Trigger. But the hero’s dour moping cuts against the effectiveness of that as a sustained mood for the overall piece, and together with some sloppy plotting in the end ultimately lands this installment a lower rating than its predecessors for me.

★★☆☆☆